Confidence Intervals for Proportions

Suppose we have a population proportion of interest. There are many examples:

- 1.
- The proportion of left-handed professional baseball players.
- 2.
- President Clinton's rating.
- 3.
- The proportion of patients with a specific disease who are under a new
drug.
- 4.
- The proportion of graduating high school students who can read at the eighth
grade level.
- 5.
- The proportion of Republicans who will vote for Bush.
- 6.
- The proportion of Democrats who will vote for Bush.
- 7.
- The proportion of Republicans who will vote for Gore.
- 8.
- The proportion of Democrats who will vote for Gore.
- 9.
- The proportion of citizens who will not vote.

**Baseball Example** . Consider the first example above: *The proportion
of left-handed professional baseball players.* We have a sample of size
59 from this population.

There are 15 left-handed baseball players so the sample proportion is
.
Thus .2542 is our estimate of the proportion of left-handed professional baseball players. How much did it miss by?

In general,
is a sample average, (Record Success as 1 and
Failure as 0, then the sum of these 0's and 1's is the number of successes and the average (divide sum by *n*) is ).
Hence we can invoke the Central Limit Theorem to determine a confidence
interval for *p*. We use a slightly different standard error, though.
The **Confidence Interval for p** is:

You have already used this. The error here is the error (except 1.96 replaces 2) that we used for our estimates of probability based on resampling. This confidence interval has the same interpretation as the one in the last section; i.e., we are fairly confident that the true population proportion is contained in the interval.

**Baseball Example**. For the baseball data,

Hence, the confidence interval is *(.2542 - .1111, .2542 + .1111)
= (.143, .365)*. So provided this data came from a random sample, we
are fairly confident that the true percentage of left-handed professional
baseball players is between 14 and 37%.

- 1.
- The cure rate for a the standard treatment of a disease is 45%. Dr. Snyder has perfected a primitive treatment which he claims is much better. As evidence, he says that he has used his new treatment on 50 patients with the disease and cured 25 of them. What do you think? Is this new treatment better. Use a 95% confidence interval to answer the question. (Ans.: (.36,.64)).
- 2.
- Experimenters injected a growth hormone gene into thousands of carp eggs. Of the 400 carp that grew from these eggs, 20 incorporated the gene into their
DNA (
*Science News*, May 20, 1989). Calculate a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of carp that would incorporate the gene into their DNA. From Statistics, S. Rasmussen, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1992. (Ans.: (.03,.07)). - 3.
- Using Carrie's baseball data, estimate the proportion of professional baseball players who weigh 200 or more pounds. Find a 95% confidence interval for this proportion and interpret it. (Ans: 21 out of 59 weigh 200 or more pounds. So the CI is: (.23, .48)).